IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION
FOR MAYOR OF NORTH LIBERTY IOWA
 HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2005
DECISION OF THE CONTEST
COURT


 

            The members of the Election Contest Court having met according to law, and after due deliberation, voted on the following issues as follows:

1.  Does the Contest Court have Jurisdiction over the election contest filed by Matthew Bahl?

The vote was:

Judge Liebig-no

Judge Meyer-yes

Judge Stein-no

            It is the decision of the court that it lacks jurisdiction over the grounds of the protest. 

2.  Assuming, arguendo, that the Court had jurisdiction, was a runoff election required by the Code of North Liberty, Iowa? 

The vote was:

Judge Liebig-no

Judge Meyer-yes

Judge Stein-no

            It is the decision of the Court that a runoff election was not required. 

            Dated this 6th day of January, 2006. 

/s/Judge Christopher J. Liebig

/s/Judge Lori A. Meyer

/s/Judge L. Jay Stein


 

 



IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION
FOR COUNCIL OF NORTH LIBERTY IOWA
HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2005
DECISION OF THE CONTEST
COURT

 

            The members of the Election Contest Court having met according to law, and after due deliberation, voted on the following issues as follows:

 

1.  Does the Contest Court have Jurisdiction over the election contest filed by Robert Gardiner? 

The vote was:

Judge Saxton-yes

Judge Schantz-no

Judge Stein-no

            It is the decision of the court that it lacks jurisdiction over the grounds of the protest. 

2.  Assuming, arguendo, that the Court had jurisdiction, was a runoff election required by the Code of North Liberty, Iowa? 

The vote was:

Judge Saxton-yes

Judge Schantz-no

Judge Stein-no

            It is the decision of the Court that a runoff election was not required. 

            Dated this 6th day of January, 2006. 

/s/Judge Elizabeth E. Saxton

/s/Judge Mark E. Schantz

/s/Judge L. Jay Stein